Single-Cell Transcriptomics of Endothelial Cells in Upper and Lower Human Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) is a type of progressive and distant metastatic tumor. Targeting anti-angiogenic genes could effectively hinder ESCC development and metastasis, whereas ESCC locating on the upper or the lower esophagus showed different response to the same clinical treatment, suggesting ESCC location should be taken into account when exploring new therapeutic targets. In the current study, to find novel anti-angiogenic therapeutic targets, we identified endothelial cell subsets in upper and lower human ESCC using single-cell RNA sequencing (scRNA-seq), screened differentially expressed genes (DEGs), and performed gene ontology (GO) and Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) analysis. The results showed that common DEGs shared in the upper and the lower endothelial cells mainly are involved in vessel development, angiogenesis, and cell motility of endothelial cells by regulating PI3K-AKT, Rap1, Ras, TGF-beta, and Apelin signaling pathways. The critical regulatory genes were identified as ITGB1, Col4A1, Col4A2, ITGA6, LAMA4, LAMB1, LAMC1, VWF, ITGA5, THBS1, PDGFB, PGF, RHOC, and CTNNB1. Cell metabolism-relevant genes, e.g., MGST3, PNP, UPP1, and HYAL2 might be the prospective therapeutic targets. Furthermore, we found that DEGs only in the upper endothelial cells, such as MAPK3, STAT3, RHOA, MAPK11, HIF1A, FGFR1, GNG5, GNB1, and ARHGEF12, mainly regulated cell adhesion, structure morphogenesis, and motility through Phospholipase D, Apelin, and VEGF signaling pathways. Moreover, DEGs only in the lower endothelial cells, for instance PLCG2, EFNA1, CALM1, and RALA, mainly regulated cell apoptosis and survival by targeting calcium ion transport through Rap1, Ras, cAMP, Phospholipase D, and Phosphatidylinositol signaling pathways. In addition, the upper endothelial cells showed significant functional diversity such as cytokine-responsive, migratory, and proliferative capacity, presenting a better angiogenic capacity and making it more sensitive to anti-angiogenic therapy compared with the lower endothelial cells. Our study has identified the potential targeted genes for anti-angiogenic therapy for both upper and lower ESCC, and further indicated that anti-angiogenic therapy might be more effective for upper ESCC, which still need to be further examined in the future.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".