MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4306404467 · doi:10.1038/s41598-022-21342-w

Discovery of small molecule inhibitors that effectively disrupt IQGAP1-Cdc42 interaction in breast cancer cells

2022· article· en· W4306404467 on OpenAlexaff
Samar Sayedyahossein, Jessica M. Smith, Elena Barnaeva, Zhigang Li, Jun Choe, Michael Ronzetti, Christopher Dextras, Xin Hu, Juan Marugán, Noel Southall, Bolormaa Baljinnyam, Louise Thines, Andy D. Tran, Marc Ferrer, David B. Sacks

Bibliographic record

VenueScientific Reports · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicCellular Mechanics and Interactions
Canadian institutionsWestern University
FundersNational Center for Advancing Translational SciencesNational Institutes of Health
KeywordsCDC42IQGAP1FilopodiaChemistryCancer cellCell biologySmall moleculeCell migrationRAC1Small GTPaseCancer researchBiologyBiochemistryGTPaseCancerCellCytoskeletonSignal transductionGenetics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The small GTPase Cdc42 is an integral component of the cytoskeleton, and its dysregulation leads to pathophysiological conditions, such as cancer. Binding of Cdc42 to the scaffold protein IQGAP1 stabilizes Cdc42 in its active form. The interaction between Cdc42 and IQGAP1 enhances migration and invasion of cancer cells. Disrupting this association could impair neoplastic progression and metastasis; however, no effective means to achieve this has been described. Here, we screened 78,500 compounds using a homogeneous time resolved fluorescence-based assay to identify small molecules that disrupt the binding of Cdc42 to IQGAP1. From the combined results of the validation assay and counter-screens, we selected 44 potent compounds for cell-based experiments. Immunoprecipitation and cell viability analysis rendered four lead compounds, namely NCGC00131308, NCGC00098561, MLS000332963 and NCGC00138812, three of which inhibited proliferation and migration of breast carcinoma cells. Microscale thermophoresis revealed that two compounds bind directly to Cdc42. One compound reduced the amount of active Cdc42 in cells and effectively impaired filopodia formation. Docking analysis provided plausible models of the compounds binding to the hydrophobic pocket adjacent to the GTP binding site of Cdc42. In conclusion, we identified small molecules that inhibit binding between Cdc42 and IQGAP1, which could potentially yield chemotherapeutic agents.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.243
Teacher spread0.234 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations14
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueScientific ReportsSame topicCellular Mechanics and InteractionsFrench-language works237,207