Study on the microbial inactivation of whole hulless barley flour using a continuous instant pressure drop sterilizer
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract This work evaluated the microbial reduction and quality change of the whole hulless barley flour (WHBF) treated by a continuous instant pressure drop (CIPD) sterilizer. The microbial reduction of WHBF was proportional to steam‐material ratio under the conditions of 165°C, 0.2 MPa steam, and 0.2 MPa Laval nozzle, and the microbial reduction was 3.87 ± 0.09 log cfu/g with the steam‐material ratio of 3.0:1. The work was followed‐up with the quality testing of CIPD, UV‐C, hot air, and ozone treated WHBF. The microbial reduction of hot air, UV‐C, and ozone treated WHBF was 3.98 ± 0.09, 3.33 ± 0.04, and 3.68 ± 0.12 log cfu/g, respectively, while the CIPD treatment achieved similar bactericidal effect at a unit treatment time of 22 s. Moreover, there is no measurable quality degradation in CIPD treated WHBF compared with the untreated WHBF. These results showed CIPD sterilizer had a great potential for microbial inactivation of powdery foods industry.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it