Geology, geochemistry and genesis of Tabei: A newly identified intermediate‐sulphidation epithermal <scp>Pb–Zn</scp> deposit adjacent to low‐sulphidation Au deposit in the Tulasu Basin, Chinese Western Tianshan
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The Tabei Pb–Zn deposit is located adjacent to the well‐known Axi low‐sulphidation epithermal Au deposit in the Tulasu Basin, Chinese Western Tianshan. The homogenization temperatures and salinities of H 2 O‐rich biphase inclusions in ore‐stage sphalerite and calcite from Tabei range from 100 to 170°C and 0.4 to 6.2 wt% NaCleq, respectively. The δ 13 C V‐PDB and δ 18 O V‐SMOW values of calcite range from 0.9‰ to 1.5‰ and 5.6‰ to 6.7‰, respectively. The δ 18 O H2O and δD H2O values of hydrothermal fluids vary from −7.0‰ to −5.9‰ and −120.8‰ to −111.1‰, respectively. The in‐situ δ 34 S V‐CDT values of sulphides range from 7.5‰ to 8.0‰ (average 7.7‰). The in‐situ Pb isotopic compositions of galena and ( 87 Sr/ 86 Sr) 0 ratios of sphalerite resemble those of Au‐bearing pyrite and quartz of Axi deposit, respectively, as well as the ore‐hosting volcanic rocks. These isotopic compositions indicate that the ore metals were derived from the ore‐hosting volcanic rocks, with the ore‐forming fluids consisting predominantly of circulating meteoric water. The absence of coexisting two‐phase vapour and liquid fluid inclusions and the presence of abundant banded coarse‐grained quartz crystals with dog tooth and comb textures at Tabei, suggest that the sulphides precipitated slowly due to conductive cooling. The high sulphide abundance, sulphide assemblage (pyrite + Fe‐poor sphalerite + galena + chalcopyrite), ore textures and isotopic compositions suggest that Tabei represents an intermediate‐sulphidation epithermal deposit. The Axi‐Tabei Au–Pb–Zn epithermal system constitutes a hybrid consisting of Au veins at shallow level and Pb–Zn veins at depth, suggesting that the base metals remain highly prospective beneath the identified Au orebodies at Axi.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".