Ultrathin <i> Ti <sub>3</sub> C <sub>2</sub> T <sub>x</sub> </i> nanosheets modified separators for lithium–sulphur batteries
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Currently, among the various emerging energy storage systems, the lithium–sulphur (Li‐S) battery is expected to be one of the next‐generation lithium secondary batteries with high efficiency. However, the practical application of Li‐S batteries still faces many obstacles. To solve the shuttle effect of lithium polysulphides, ultrathin Ti 3 C 2 T x nanosheets were prepared through the in‐situ acid etching method and applied to separator modification to suppress the shuttle effect of lithium polysulphides. Ultrathin Ti 3 C 2 T x nanosheets with enlarged interlayer spacing accelerated the migration of Li + . The abundant termination groups on the surface of Ti 3 C 2 T x played the role of the lithium polysulphide capture centre. When the mass loading of separator modification materials was set as 0.025 mg cm −2 , the as‐prepared battery exhibited a reversible specific capacity as high as 780 mAh g −1 after 200 cycles at 0.2 C, and the single‐cycle capacity decay rate was only 0.09%.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".