Genetic and phenotypic correlations between Aleutian disease tests with body weight, growth, and feed efficiency traits in mink
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The ineffectiveness of vaccination, medicine, and culling strategy leads mink farmers to control Aleutian disease (AD) by selecting AD-resilient mink based on AD tests. However, the genetic background of AD tests and their correlations with economically important or AD-resilient traits are limited. This study estimated the genetic and phenotypic correlations between four AD tests and seven body weight (BW) traits, six growth parameters from the Richards growth model, and eight feed-related traits. Univariate models were used to test the significance (P < 0.05) of fixed effects (sex, color type, AD test year, birth year, and row-by-year), random effects (additive genetic, maternal genetic, and permanent environmental), and a covariate of age using ASReml 4.1. Likewise, pairwise bivariate analyses were conducted to estimate the phenotypic and genetic correlations among the studied traits. Both antigen- and virus capsid protein-based enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay tests (ELISA-G and ELISA-P) showed significant (P < 0.05) moderate positive genetic correlations (±SE) with maturation rate (from 0.36 ± 0.18 to 0.38 ± 0.19). ELISA-G showed a significant negative genetic correlation (±SE) with average daily gain (ADG, -0.37 ± 0.16). ELISA-P showed a significant positive moderate genetic correlation (±SE) with off-feed days (DOF, 0.42 ± 0.17). These findings indicated that selection for low ELISA scores would reduce the maturation rate, increase ADG (by ELISA-G), and minimize DOF (by ELISA-P). The iodine agglutination test (IAT) showed significant genetic correlations with DOF (0.73 ± 0.16), BW at 16 weeks of age (BW16, 0.45 ± 0.23), and BW at harvest (HW, -0.47 ± 0.20), indicating that selection for lower IAT scores would lead to lower DOF and BW16, and higher HW. These estimated genetic correlations suggested that the selection of AD tests would not cause adverse effects on the growth, feed efficiency, and feed intake of mink. The estimates from this study might strengthen the previous finding that ELISA-G could be applied as a reliable and practical indicator trait in the genetic selection of AD-resilient mink in AD-positive farms.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".