MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4306682588 · doi:10.52403/ijhsr.20221023

Effect of Resistance Training on Improving Cognitive Function in Subjects Having Type 2 Diabetes with Mild Cognitive Impairment

2022· article· en· W4306682588 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Beesmol Babu, Manju Unnikrishnan, N Remya

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Health Sciences and Research · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicNatural Antidiabetic Agents Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineMontreal Cognitive AssessmentCognitionType 2 diabetesGlycemicPhysical therapyDiabetes mellitusType 2 Diabetes MellitusEffects of sleep deprivation on cognitive performanceCognitive impairmentPsychiatryEndocrinology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND: Diabetes mellitus is a metabolic illness that happens whenever blood glucose levels increase. Investigations have proven that Type 2 diabetes is associated with higher risk of cognitive impairment and functional limitations. The extent and severity of cognitive dysfunctions depending upon the duration of diabetes and glycemic control, but it is difficult to do a prediction on who will be at a higher risk for developing cognitive dysfunctions. Cognitive impairment can put up to functional limitations and lead to functionally dependence. Recent researches have shown that cognition and motor performance are interdependent and integration of these two functions are required for the successful performance of daily life activities. Purpose: To investigate the effects of Resistance training on Cognition in people with type 2 diabetes mellitus having mild cognitive impairments, Materials and method: Thirty type 2 diabetes mellitus subjects between the age group of 45 -60 years were selected purposively and were randomly divided into two groups, Group A and Group B, with 15 in each group. Group A received resistance training along with conventional physiotherapy for 3 days a week for 4 months. Group B received conventional physiotherapy alone. Montreal Cognitive Assessment scale (MoCA) was used to assess cognition. Pre score was taken before the first session and post score was taken after 4 months, using Montreal cognitive assessment scale (MoCA). Analysis: Follow up values was taken after four months. The results from outcome measure suggest that Group A (p<0.05) has greater effects when compared to Group B. The pre and post values of MoCA was analysed using Paired t-test and Wilcoxon signed rank test for within the group analysis and the between group analysis was done using Mann Whitney U Test. The corresponding p value of less than 0.05 was considered significant for each outcome. RESULTS: Comparison of Group A and Group B using MoCA score at the end of study in both group was found to statistically significant (p<0.05).The Group A shows greater statistical significance when compared with Group B. CONCLUSION: The study reveals that the addition of resistance training along with conventional exercises enhances cognitive function in subjects having type 2 diabetes mellitus with mild cognitive impairment. Key words: Resistance training/resisted exercise, Mild Cognitive Impairment, Type 2 diabetes mellitus.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.006
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.227
Threshold uncertainty score0.247

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0060.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.063
GPT teacher head0.418
Teacher spread0.356 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Journal of Health Sciences and ResearchSame topicNatural Antidiabetic Agents StudiesFrench-language works237,207