Indigenous Birth Support Worker (IBSW) Program Evaluation: A Qualitative Analysis of Program Workers and Clients’ Perspectives
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Background: The Indigenous Birth Support Worker (IBSW) Program provides indigenous women with respectful, culturally safe, and trauma-informed care and supports women and families during labor and delivery. Located in the Jim Pattison Children’s Hospital (JPCH) Maternal Care Centre in Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, Canada, the program served 1023 clients between December 2019 and January 2021. Methods: The study objective was to explore the perspectives of the IBSWs and program clients one year post-implementation. The research plan was developed in collaboration with the IBSW program director and manager, IBSWs, and partners from the First Nation and Métis Health departments within the health region. A focus group with four IBSWs and individual interviews with ten clients who received services were conducted using a qualitative research design. Results: Thematic analysis revealed that clients greatly appreciated and respected the IBSWs’ cultural support and their compassionate, nonjudgmental, and safe care. IBSWs emphasized the importance of culturally safe and client-centered treatment, more effective pain management solutions, and that relationships with elders and community healthcare personnel should be built and strengthened to improve pregnancy and postnatal care delivery. IBSWs desire to work with community healthcare providers to provide prenatal care and build relationships before delivery. IBSWs advocated for collaborative cooperation with community healthcare professionals and rural healthcare teams to enable a smooth care flow to and from communities. Conclusion: The IBSW program’s client-centered, culturally responsive, compassionate care assisted in meeting the maternal healthcare needs of indigenous women in a hospital context. Birthing families should be provided with elders and spiritual and cultural teachings that support the birthing ceremony throughout the preconception, pregnancy, delivery, postpartum, and postpartum losses. Closer collaboration between IBSWs and healthcare practitioners is advised, as it can aid in identifying healthcare needs and improving timely access to relevant services.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.020 | 0.018 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.007 | 0.004 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.005 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".