Characteristics of Older Adults Attending the Emergency Department for Suicidal Thoughts or Voluntary Intoxication: A Multicenter Retrospective Cohort Study
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Objective The objective of this article is to explore the characteristics of older adults visiting the ED for suicidal thoughts and/or voluntary intoxication. Methods All older adults (65 years or older) who visited one of the five University Hospital Center (CHU) of Quebec EDs in 2016 and who reported suicidal thoughts or intoxication in triage or received a relevant discharge diagnosis were included. Results A total of 478 ED visits were identified, of which 332 ED visits (n=279 patients) were included. The mean age was 72.6 (standard deviation 6.8) years old and 41.6% were female. Mood disorders (41.2%) and alcoholism (40.5%) were common. Nearly 30% of all ED visits (n=109) resulted in a referral for a mental health assessment. In the subsequent year (2017), 38.4% returned to the ED for suicidal ideations. There were 7.9% who attended the ED five times or more. Conclusions ED visits for suicidal thoughts and intoxication in older adults are common among men with known mood disorders or alcoholism. ED dispositions are variable, and access to a mental health assessment is not consistent.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".