Pseudomonas fitomaticsae sp. nov., isolated at Marimurtra Botanical Garden in Blanes, Catalonia, Spain
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In the framework of the research project called fitomatics, we have isolated and characterized a bacterial plant-endophyte from the rhizomes of Iris germanica, hereafter referred to as strain FIT81T. The bacterium is Gram negative, rod-shaped with lophotrichous flagella, and catalase- and oxidase-positive. The optimal growth temperature of strain FIT81T is 28 °C, although it can grow within a temperature range of 4–32 °C. The pH growth tolerance ranges between pH 5 and 10, and it tolerates 4% (w/v) NaCl. A 16S rRNA phylogenetic analysis positioned strain FIT81T within the genus Pseudomonas , and multilocus sequence analysis revealed that Pseudomonas gozinkensis IzPS32dT, Pseudomonas glycinae MS586T, Pseudomonas allokribbensis IzPS23T, 'Pseudomonas kribbensis' 46–2 and Pseudomonas koreensis PS9-14T are the top five most closely related species, which were selected for further genome-to-genome comparisons, as well as for physiological and chemotaxonomic characterization. The genome size of strain FIT81T is 6 492 796 base-pairs long, with 60.6 mol% of G+C content. Average nucleotide identity and digital DNA–DNA hybridization analyses yielded values of 93.6 and 56.1%, respectively, when the FIT81T genome was compared to that of the closest type strain P. gozinkensis IzPS32dT. Taken together, the obtained genomic, physiologic and chemotaxonomic data indicate that strain FIT81T is different from its closest relative species, which lead us to suggest that it is a novel species to be included in the list of type strains with the name Pseudomonas fitomaticsae sp. nov. (FIT81T=CECT 30374T=DSM 112699T).
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".