MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4306840961 · doi:10.1021/acsomega.2c04811

Impact of N, O Heteroatoms in Asphaltene on Adsorption of Vanadyl/Nickel Etioporphyrin

2022· article· en· W4306840961 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Feifei Chen, Qin Wang, Linzhou Zhang, Qiushi Zhu

Bibliographic record

VenueACS Omega · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldChemistry
TopicPetroleum Processing and Analysis
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersNatural Science Foundation of Anhui ProvinceHuaibei Normal University
KeywordsAsphalteneGrapheneAdsorptionHeteroatomSteric effectsChemistryMetalNickelHydrocarbonSolventAromaticityDiffusionChemical engineeringInorganic chemistryOrganic chemistryMoleculeRing (chemistry)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The interaction between functionalized graphene and metal porphyrins was studied for a better understanding of the influence of the N and O heteroatoms in asphaltene on demetallization efficiency during the solvent deasphalting process. The theoretical simulation indicated a strong inhibitory effect of the aminated/carboxylated side group for chemical adsorption of metal porphyrins. The differences of adsorption behavior for graphene, aminated graphene, and Canadian oil sands bitumen vacuum tower bottom asphaltene (VTB-asp) were also analyzed. It was found that the introduction of aminated side groups to the graphene not only compromised the electron delocalization capacity of the polyaromatic nuclei hydrocarbon skeleton of graphene but also caused a steric hindrance effect on the internal diffusion of metal porphyrins, leading to decreased adsorption active sites and internal diffusion rate, respectively. It was also found that metal porphyrins can be barely adsorbed on carboxylated graphene at 25 °C.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.271
Teacher spread0.258 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueACS OmegaSame topicPetroleum Processing and AnalysisFrench-language works237,207