<i>Frum mames</i> : faire la maternité, le genre et la judéité parmi les femmes juives hassidiques de Montréal
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Based on fieldwork observations and interviews, this article offers both a theoretical and methodological reflection on the study of the maternity among Hasidic Jewish women at the crossroads of two approaches. The first considers motherhood from a feminist phenomenological perspective, emphasizing the lived and embodied dimension of the feminine; following Butler and queer theorists, this translates into a vision of motherhood and more broadly of gender, as doing. The second propose to consider Jewishness rather than Judaism, and grasp it as a «lived discursive tradition» in the wake of Talal Asad and the lived religion approach. The preliminary results of my research illustrate the heuristic scope of this framing, highlighting the gendered character of Jewishness and especially underling how doing motherhood, gender and Jewishness is strongly intertwined and displayed through acts of daily care. It is through these gestures, among other things, that these women develop and foster their connection both with the divine and the past and the future of Jewish people.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.007 | 0.004 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.006 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".