MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4306935388 · doi:10.1016/j.fcr.2022.108731

Biological nitrogen fixation potential of pea lines derived from crosses with nodulation mutants

2022· article· en· W4306935388 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.

Bibliographic record

VenueField Crops Research · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicLegume Nitrogen Fixing Symbiosis
Canadian institutionsAgriculture and Agri-Food CanadaUniversity of Saskatchewan
Fundersnot available
KeywordsNitrogen fixationField peaBiologyAgronomyCultivarCropSowingCrop yieldGrain yield

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The process of biological nitrogen fixation (BNF) through nodules of legumes benefits soil fertility, increases crop productivity and reduces the requirement for chemical fertilizers. Pea is an important pulse crop in temperate regions of the world. The N fixation capacity of pea in Canadian environments ranges from 50% to 55% of crop N requirement. Nodulation mutants in pea have been developed but not evaluated in a breeding program. To determine the potential of 20 pea lines derived from crosses between two nodulation mutants (Rondo nod3 and Frisson P88 Sym29) and Saskatchewan adapted pea cultivars CDC Meadow and CDC Dakota, for BNF and agronomic performance. Pea lines were evaluated in replicated multi-location field trials. In four of the trials, a 15N isotope treatment was applied two weeks after planting to estimate the percentage of N derived from air (%Ndfa) using the 15N isotope dilution protocol. Additionally, standard agronomic assessments for pea were collected from each plot, as well as grain yield and seed protein concentration. Biological N fixation capacity of the pea lines ranged from 50% to 80%. Several of the pea lines performed significantly better than the check cultivars CDC Meadow and CDC Dakota for yield, percentage protein and BNF capacity. Pea lines, especially those arising from crosses with CDC Dakota, had on average 10% more seed yield, 2–3% more seed protein, and fixed 5% more N than CDC Meadow and CDC Dakota. The %Ndfa showed moderately high and significantly positive correlation with days to flowering (r = 0.47, p < 0.01), days to maturity (r = 0.56, p < 0.01) and seed protein concentration (r = 0.51, p < 0.01). The ability of tested pea lines to produce high grain yield along with higher N fixation potential and seed protein concentration makes them attractive for use in pea breeding programs. This research opens the potential for breeding pea for improved N fixation which will have positive implications for reducing greenhouse gas emissions in a cereal-oilseed-pulse crop rotation.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.294
Threshold uncertainty score0.997

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.054
GPT teacher head0.296
Teacher spread0.241 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it