The Image of Amman City: Structure, Identity, and Meaning
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The study provides a better understanding of how city inhabitants perceive and navigate their surroundings hence the urban environment consists of both physical elements and mental representations. The study objective is to review the concept of the image of the city and its implementation in Downtown Amman - Jordan using the descriptive-analytical methodology in addition to site visits and observation that provides a detailed urban mental map for Downtown Amman illustrated by the different layers of the urban fabric. the study shed light on three components of the city image: Identity (the recognition of urban elements as distinct entities), structure (the relationship between urban elements and the observer), and meaning (the relationship between urban elements and the emotional value for the observer). By summarizing the analysis of the downtown Amman image, a visual representation of what appear to be the key issues in the city image. The analysis shows problems such as "Break of continuity", "Branching" and "Lack of integration" have appeared due to the lack of clear organization of the shape of the city facades and the way signs are placed, as well as the mixing of pedestrian paths with vehicles traffic.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it