MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4307009272 · doi:10.3749/canmin.2100041

Mengeite, Ba(Mg,Mn2+)Mn3+4(PO4)4(OH)4·4H2O, a New Mineral from the Spring Creek Mine, South Australia, Australia

2022· article· en· W4307009272 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Peter Elliott

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Canadian Mineralogist · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicCrystal Structures and Properties
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTriclinic crystal systemOctahedronCrystallographyQuartzElectron microprobeMohs scale of mineral hardnessPleochroismStructural formulaChemistryCrystal structureGeologyMineralogyMaterials scienceMetallurgy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

ABSTRACT Mengeite, Ba(Mg,Mn2+)Mn3+4(PO4)4(OH)4·4H2O, is a new mineral from the Spring Creek copper mine, near Wilmington, South Australia, Australia, where it occurs as dark orange-red masses to 0.8 mm across in a quartz matrix. The streak is pale salmon pink and the luster is vitreous. Mengeite is non-fluorescent and the Mohs hardness is ∼3. The measured density is 3.40 g/cm3 and the calculated density is 3.43 g/cm3. Mengeite is biaxial (–) with α = 1.757(4), β = 1.776(4), γ = 1.781(4) measured in white light. Electron microprobe analyses results give the empirical formula, based on 24 O apfu: Ba1.09(Mg0.58Mn2+0.26Cu0.10Al0.02Na0.01Ca0.01□0.09)Σ1.07Mn3+3.88(PO4)4.07(OH)3.52·4.13H2O. The idealized formula is Ba(Mg,Mn2+)Mn3+4(PO4)4(OH)4·4H2O. Mengeite is triclinic, space group , with a = 5.4262(11), b = 5.4274(11), c = 16.387(3) Å, α = 87.61(3), β = 98.97(3), γ = 110.56(3)°, V = 446.28(16) Å3, and Z = 1. The crystal structure of mengeite was solved using synchrotron single-crystal X-ray diffraction data and refined to R1 = 0.0453 for 2115 observed reflections with F0 > 4σ(F0). It is based on [(M2(OH)2(AsO4)2] sheets that are linked in the c-direction alternately by [M3(H2O)4O2] octahedra and by BaO10 polyhedra.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.349
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0020.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0020.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0160.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.068
GPT teacher head0.254
Teacher spread0.186 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Canadian MineralogistSame topicCrystal Structures and PropertiesFrench-language works237,207