MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4307035822 · doi:10.21037/apm-22-701

Cognitive improvement effects of Tian Wang Bu Xin Dan (Cheonwangbosimdan) in patients with mild cognitive impairment: protocol for a randomized placebo-controlled pilot clinical trial

2022· article· en· W4307035822 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Jae‐Hong Kim, Jaehee Yoo, Gwang-Cheon Park, Jeong-Soon Lee

Bibliographic record

VenueAnnals of Palliative Medicine · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicDementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersMinistry of Science and ICT, South KoreaNational Research Foundation of KoreaNational Research Foundation
KeywordsMedicineCognitive impairmentCognitionPlaceboRandomized controlled trialClinical trialAnxietyDiseasePhysical therapyPsychiatryInternal medicineAlternative medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND: It is important to develop effective treatments to prevent the progress of mild cognitive impairment to Alzheimer's disease. Cheonwangbosimdan has been widely prescribed for palpitation, anxiety, insomnia, and memory decline. We aimed to obtain clinical trial data concerning the safety and efficacy of Cheonwangbosimdan for mild cognitive impairment. METHODS: This clinical trial would be a single-center, double-blinded, parallel-arm, prospective, randomized controlled trial. Forty-eight participants with mild cognitive impairment would be randomly allocated evenly to the placebo or Cheonwangbosimdan groups. Participants will be educated on self-management and exercise at baseline and will receive the trial medication (Cheonwangbosimdan group, Cheonwangbosimdan; placebo group, placebo) once daily for 24 weeks. Primary outcome would include the changes in the Montreal Cognitive Assessment scale scores at the end of the intervention. Secondary outcomes would include the changes in the Montreal Cognitive Assessment scale scores at 12 weeks following the first intervention and changes in the scores of the Alzheimer's Disease Assessment Scale-cognitive subscale-3, the European Quality of Life Five Dimension Five Level scale, Korean Instrumental Activities of Daily Living, Korean Activities of Daily Living, and Geriatric Depression Scale at 12 and 24 weeks following the first intervention. DISCUSSION: The results of our trial would provide clinical trial data concerning the usefulness, safety, and efficacy of Cheonwangbosimdan in the management of mild cognitive impairment. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Clinical Research Information Service (Date: November 26, 2021; Registration No. KCT0006787; https://cris.nih.go.kr/cris/search/detailSearch.do?search_lang=E&search_page=M&pageSize=10&page=undefined&seq=20869&status=5&seq_group=20869).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.020
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.015
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Randomized trial · Consensus signal: Randomized trial
GenreCandidate signal: Protocol · Consensus signal: Protocol
Teacher disagreement score0.041
Threshold uncertainty score0.138

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0200.015
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0060.003
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0110.005
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0040.004
Scholarly communication0.0030.003
Open science0.0040.002
Research integrity0.0070.007
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0410.007

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.082
GPT teacher head0.444
Teacher spread0.362 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designRandomized trial
Domainnot available
GenreProtocol

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAnnals of Palliative MedicineSame topicDementia and Cognitive Impairment ResearchFrench-language works237,207