MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4307054533 · doi:10.1093/pch/pxac100.022

23 Assessing the effects of introducing prophylactic hydrocortisone in extremely low gestational age infants in a tertiary Canadian NICU

2022· article· en· W4307054533 on OpenAlexaffabout
Marisa de Souza, Raymond Melika, Bernard Thébaud, Nick Barrowman, Anne Tsampalieros, Brigitte Lemyre

Bibliographic record

VenuePaediatrics & Child Health · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicNeonatal Respiratory Health Research
Canadian institutionsAgricultural Research Institute of OntarioOttawa Hospital
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineGestational ageBronchopulmonary dysplasiaIncidence (geometry)PediatricsHydrocortisoneBirth weightDexamethasoneRetrospective cohort studyNeonatal intensive care unitSepsisLow birth weightSurgeryInternal medicinePregnancy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Background Bronchopulmonary dysplasia (BPD) is a common complication of preterm birth. A large trial and a meta-analysis support the early use of physiologic doses of hydrocortisone to reduce the incidence of death or moderate/severe BPD. In 2019, this practice was introduced for all preterm infants <28 weeks gestational age (GA) at our university-affiliated tertiary care NICU. Objectives To determine the effect of prophylactic hydrocortisone on the incidence of survival with mild or no BPD in neonates born <28 weeks GA. Secondary objectives were to compare safety outcomes related to prophylactic hydrocortisone use: late onset sepsis, gastrointestinal perforation, severe intraventricular hemorrhage (IVH) and use of postnatal dexamethasone. Design/Methods We performed a retrospective cohort study of infants born <28 weeks GA admitted to our NICU during 2 epochs, before and after the implementation of prophylactic hydrocortisone. The primary objective was evaluated using logistic regression adjusted for GA. Safety outcomes were compared using chi-square or Fisher’s exact test. Results Epoch 1 included 76 infants and epoch 2 included 71 infants, of whom 63 (88.7%) received prophylactic hydrocortisone. Infants in the two epochs were similar in terms of median (IQR) GA 26.5 (25.0, 27.2) vs 26.7 (25.1, 27.1) weeks GA, mean (SD) weight at admission (882g +/- 212 vs 841g +/- 176), APGAR at 5 minutes, use of antenatal steroids and/or surfactant, and need for intubation at delivery (all p>0.5). Three infants were transferred to another hospital and their BPD status could not be determined. Adjusting for GA, there was a statistically non-significant signal for increased survival with mild or no BPD in epoch 2 (adjusted odds ratio 1.68, 95% CI 0.80, 3.59, p= 0.17) compared to epoch 1. The two epochs had similar incidence of late onset sepsis, gastrointestinal perforation and need for postnatal dexamethasone, however, in epoch 2, fewer infants developed grade 3/4 IVH on head ultrasound within the first two weeks of life (7/71, 9.9%) compared to epoch 1 (21/76, 27.6%, p= 0.01). Conclusion Prophylactic hydrocortisone may be associated with increased survival with mild or no BPD. Safety outcomes in both epochs were similar, but with a significantly decreased incidence of grade 3/4 IVH in the prophylactic hydrocortisone group. Larger cohort studies are required before a clear recommendation for prophylactic hydrocortisone can be made.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.012
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.107
Threshold uncertainty score0.216

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.012
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.002
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.327
Teacher spread0.311 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2022
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePaediatrics & Child Health→Same topicNeonatal Respiratory Health Research→French-language works237,207→