Ultrafast Myocardial Principal Strain Ultrasound Elastography During Stress Tests: In Vitro Validation and In Vivo Feasibility
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Objective myocardial contractility assessment during stress tests aims to improve the diagnosis of myocardial ischemia. Tissue Doppler imaging (TDI) or optical flow (OF) speckle tracking echocardiography (STE) has been used to quantify myocardial contractility at rest. However, this is more challenging during stress tests due to image decorrelation at high heart rates. Moreover, stress tests imply a high frame rate which leads to a limited lateral field of view. Therefore, a large lateral field-of-view robust ultrafast myocardial regularized OF-TDI principal strain estimator has been developed for high-frame-rate echocardiography of coherently compounded transmitted diverging waves. The feasibility and accuracy of the proposed estimator were validated in vitro (using sonomicrometry as the gold standard) and in vivo stress experiments. Compared with OF strain imaging, the proposed estimator improved the accuracy of principal major and minor strains during stress tests, with an average contrast-to-noise ratio improvement of 4.4 ± 2.7 dB (${p}$-value${R}^{{2}}$and biases ± STD between them were 0.96 ± 0.04 (${p}$-value${p}$-value < 0.01) and 0.04 ± 0.06% in the lateral direction, respectively. These results suggest that the proposed estimator could be useful clinically to provide an accurate and quantitative 2-D large lateral field-of-view myocardial strain assessment at high heart rates during stress echocardiography.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".