MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4307126062 · doi:10.1029/2022ja030870

Dependencies of GPS Scintillation Indices on the Ionospheric Plasma Drift and Rate of Change of TEC Around the Dawn Sector of the Polar Ionosphere

2022· article· en· W4307126062 on OpenAlexaffabout
Yong Wang, P. T. Jayachandran, Yu‐Zhang Ma, Qinghe Zhang, Zan‐Yang Xing, J. M. Ruohoniemi, Simon Shepherd, M. Lester

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Geophysical Research Space Physics · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicIonosphere and magnetosphere dynamics
Canadian institutionsUniversity of New Brunswick
FundersScience and Technology Facilities Council
KeywordsTECScintillationIonosphereInterplanetary scintillationTotal electron contentGlobal Positioning SystemRefractive indexGeodesyPlasmaPhysicsGeologyGeophysicsOpticsTelecommunications

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract The dependencies of global positioning system (GPS) scintillation indices on ionospheric plasma flow and the rate of change of total electron content (TEC) around the dawn sector for the first time of the polar ionosphere are investigated. The phase scintillation index ( σ φ ) derived from GPS measurements of the Canadian High Arctic Ionospheric Network (CHAIN) shows linear dependencies on both the plasma drift speed measured by the SuperDARN radar and on the rate of change of TEC estimated from the GPS receivers of CHAIN. However, the amplitude scintillation index (S 4 ) does not show any dependence on the plasma flow or the rate of change of TEC. These results further support Wang et al. (2018), https://doi.org/10.1002/2017JA024805 at the noon sector. The dependence of the phase scintillation index on the plasma flow further evidences that the standard phase scintillation index is dominated by refractive variations due to the use of a fixed cut‐off frequency of 0.1 Hz while detrending the phase observable. The dependence of the phase scintillation index on the rate of change of TEC consolidates the dominance of refractive variations inside.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.343
Threshold uncertainty score0.415

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.046
GPT teacher head0.288
Teacher spread0.242 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations17
Published2022
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Geophysical Research Space PhysicsSame topicIonosphere and magnetosphere dynamicsFrench-language works237,207