MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4307244604 · doi:10.17294/2694-4715.1033

Key Healthcare Providers’ Perspectives on the Implementation of Senior-Friendly Emergency Department Care in Quebec

2022· article· en· W4307244604 on OpenAlexfundaboutno aff
Deniz Cetin‐Sahin, Francine M. Ducharme, Jane McCusker, Mona Magalhaes, Nathalie Veillette, Paul-André Lachance, Sylvie Cossette, Rick Mah, T.T. Minh Vu, Simon Berthelot

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Geriatric Emergency Medicine · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldHealth Professions
TopicHealthcare Systems and Practices
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersFonds de recherche du Québec
KeywordsEmergency departmentHealth careKey (lock)Medical emergencyNursingBusinessMedicineComputer scienceComputer securityPolitical science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background: Senior-friendly emergency department (ED) care is emerging to address large numbers of older adults in healthcare and implementation is variable. Objectives: We aimed to explore key healthcare providers’ perspectives on factors affecting implementation of senior-friendly ED care during the first five years of the Senior-Friendly Hospital Initiative in the Province of Quebec, Canada. Methods: We conducted a descriptive qualitative study of four urban EDs. Key healthcare providers involved in care within the ED or after discharge to the community were purposefully selected. Semi-structured telephone interviews were conducted in participants’ preferred language, English or French. Recorded interviews were transcribed. A deductive-inductive thematic analysis was performed focusing on factors affecting implementation at the three following levels: provider-level (ED frontline staff, multidisciplinary, geriatric, and community providers), organizational-level (ED and hospital), and structural-level (health system and policies). Results: In total, 33 providers participated. The sample included 13 ED frontline nurses and physicians, 13 multidisciplinary and geriatric ED care providers, and 7 community partners from the local government health centres working closely with these EDs. Analysis of participants’ perceptions revealed one theme representing implementation at the provider level (attitude to senior-friendly care), six themes representing the organizational level (managerial support, staff training, protocols for care and tools, space and equipment, multidisciplinary support, hospital services support), and three themes representing the structural level (health information system, healthcare network, and staff and budget). Conclusion: Healthcare providers identified themes that can inform the development, effectiveness, and sustainability of other senior-friendly ED programs. Overall, successful implementation of senior-friendly ED care primarily depends on providers’ attitudes, but it requires a multidimensional approach and continuous support from organizations and healthcare systems.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: Qualitative
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.227
Threshold uncertainty score0.987

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0140.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.058
GPT teacher head0.465
Teacher spread0.407 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2022
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Geriatric Emergency MedicineSame topicHealthcare Systems and PracticesFrench-language works237,207