MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4307246599 · doi:10.1093/eurpub/ckac129.277

Policy to cover perinatal care costs: a quasi-experimental study on adverse newborn health outcomes

2022· article· en· W4307246599 on OpenAlexaff
AM Epure, E Courtin, Philippe Wanner, Arnaud Chioléro, Stéphane Cullati

Bibliographic record

VenueEuropean Journal of Public Health · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicBirth, Development, and Health
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineLow birth weightBirth weightGestational ageObstetricsGestationConfidence intervalOdds ratioPediatricsPremature birthRegression discontinuity designPregnancyPrenatal carePopulationEnvironmental healthInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Background Low birth weight (LBW) and preterm birth are associated with an increased risk of neonatal death and chronic conditions across the life course. Reducing LBW is a global public health priority and requires strategies to improve healthcare during pregnancy. We aimed to assess the effect of a health policy providing full coverage of illness-related costs from 13 weeks of gestation through 8 weeks postpartum on birth outcomes and neonatal mortality in Switzerland. Methods We applied a regression discontinuity design to administrative data gathered as part of a Swiss research program (NCCR on the Move). We included all children (N = 166,709) born between March 1, 2013 and February 28, 2015. The outcomes were birth weight (BW), gestational age (GA), LBW (<2,500 g) and very low birth weight (VLBW; <1,500 g), preterm (<37 weeks of gestation), and extremely preterm (<28 weeks), and neonatal (≤ 28 days) death. Children were exposed to the policy if they were born from March 1, 2014 onwards. We estimated the intention-to-treat effect of the policy using parametric regression models. Results Children had a mean BW of 3,291 g and mean GA of 275 days. The prevalence of LBW was 6.4%, VLBW 1%, preterm 7.2%, and extremely preterm 0.4%, respectively. Some 0.3% newborn died within one month. The policy increased BW (mean difference =13 g [95% confidence interval (CI): 1, 25]) and decreased the risk of LBW (odds ratio [OR]=0.89; 95% CI: 0.82, 0.98) and VLBW (OR = 0.81; 95% CI: 0.64, 1.01). Additionally, the policy slightly decreased the risk of preterm birth (OR = 0.94; 95% CI: 0.87, 1.03), while it did not affect GA. Effect estimates for extremely preterm and neonatal mortality were imprecise and inconclusive. Conclusions This quasi-experimental and population based-study of 166,709 live births between 2013 and 2015 in Switzerland provides evidence of a reduction in the risk of LBW, VLBW and preterm birth thanks to a health policy that fully covered healthcare services during maternity. Key messages • Free access to healthcare during pregnancy may mitigate adverse newborn health outcomes. • A Swiss health policy that fully covered healthcare services during pregnancy reduced the risk of low birth weight and preterm births.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.022
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.039
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.022
Threshold uncertainty score0.116

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0220.039
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.002
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.002
Scholarly communication0.0020.002
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0030.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0130.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.065
GPT teacher head0.378
Teacher spread0.313 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEuropean Journal of Public Health→Same topicBirth, Development, and Health→French-language works237,207→