The plastomes of <i>Hyalomonas oviformis</i> and <i>Hyalogonium fusiforme</i> evolved dissimilar architectures after the loss of photosynthesis
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract The loss of photosynthesis in land plants and algae is typically associated with parasitism but can also occur in free‐living species, including chlamydomonadalean green algae. The plastid genomes (ptDNAs) of colorless chlamydomonadaleans are surprisingly diverse in architecture, including highly expanded forms ( Polytoma uvella and Leontynka pallida ) as well as outright genome loss ( Polytomella species). Here, we explore the ptDNAs of Hyalomonas (Hm.) oviformis (SAG 62‐27; formerly known as Polytoma oviforme ) and Hyalogonium (Hg.) fusiforme (SAG 62‐1c), each representing independent losses of photosynthesis within the Chlamydophyceae. The Hm. oviformis ptDNA is moderately sized (132 kb) with a reduced gene complement (but still encoding the ATPase subunits) and is in fact smaller than that of its photosynthetic relative Hyalomonas chlamydogama SAG 11‐48b (198.3 kb). The Hg. fusiforme plastome, however, is the largest yet observed in nonphotosynthetic plants or algae (~463 kb) and has a coding repertoire that is almost identical to that of its photosynthetic relatives in the genus Chlorogonium . Furthermore, the ptDNA of Hg. fusiforme shows no clear evidence of pseudogenization, which is consistent with our analyses showing that Hg. fusiforme is the nonphotosynthetic lineage of most recent origin among known colorless Chlamydophyceae. Together, these new ptDNAs clearly show that, in contrast to parasitic algae, plastid genome compaction is not an obligatory route following the loss of photosynthesis in free‐living algae, and that certain chlamydomonadalean algae have a remarkable propensity for genomic expansion, which can persist regardless of the trophic strategy.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".