Autoantibody-mediated Macrophage Dysfunction in Patients with Severe Asthma with Airway Infections
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Rationale Localized autoimmune responses have been reported in patients with severe eosinophilic asthma, characterized by eosinophil degranulation and airway infections. Objective To determine the presence of autoantibodies against macrophage scavenger receptors within the airways and their effects on macrophage function and susceptibility to infection. Methods Anti-EPX (eosinophil peroxidase), anti-MARCO (macrophage receptor with collagenous structure) IgG titers, and T1 and T2 (type 1/2) cytokines were measured in 221 sputa from 143 well-characterized patients with severe asthma. Peripheral monocytes and MDMs (monocyte-derived macrophages) isolated from healthy control subjects were treated with immunoprecipitated immunoglobulins from sputa with high anti-MARCO titers or nonspecific IgG to assess uptake of Streptococcus pneumoniae or response to the bacterial product LPS. Measurements and Main Results Anti-MARCO IgG was detected in 36% of patients, with significantly higher titers (up to 1:16) in patients with mixed granulocytic sputa, indicative of airway infections. Multivariate regression analysis confirmed increased frequency of degranulation (free eosinophil granules), increased blood eosinophils (indicative of high T2 burden), increased sputum total cell count, peripheral blood leukocytes (indicative of infection), and lymphopenia were associated with increased anti-MARCO IgG titers; IL-15 (odds ratio [OR], 1.79; confidence interval [CI], 1.19–2.70), IL-13 (OR, 1.06; CI, 1.02–1.12), and IL-12p70 (OR, 3.34; CI, 1.32–8.40) were the associated cytokines. Patients with anti-MARCO antibodies had higher chances of subsequent infective versus eosinophilic exacerbations (P = 0.01). MDMs treated with immunoprecipitated immunoglobulins (anti-MARCO+ sputa) had reduced bacterial uptake by 39% ± 15% and significantly reduced release of IL-10 and granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF) (P < 0.05) in response to an LPS stimulus. Conclusions Autoantibodies against macrophage scavenger receptors in eosinophilic asthma airways may impede effective host defenses and lead to recurrent infective bronchitis.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".