Students of Palestine Technical University Khadoori Awareness of “University Education Democracy” Concept
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This study conducted to investigate the Students of Palestine Technical University khadoori Awareness of the Concept “University Education Democracy”. The study conducted during the second semester of the academic year 2020-2021, using the descriptive approach. The population of the study consisted of all the University students, which were (870) students. From this, population (290) students were chosen as a random cluster sample. The researchers developed a questionnaire with (45) items. The results showed that the awareness of Palestine Technical University Students of the concept “University education democracy” was high with a mean of (4.12) out of (5). The result also revealed that there were no statistically significant differences in due to gender, Place of residence, and Academic Specialization. However, there were statistically significant differences due to Academic Degree in favor of B.Sc. students and due to Academic Level in favor of third level. In light of the results, the researchers recommended that there is a need of the university administration to understand the degree of student’s awareness to the concept of university education democracy. In addition universities should develop its systems to meet with the student’s awareness of the university education democracy. Moreover, there is a need for giving workshops and courses to the students to raise their awareness towards democratic education and to enhance their communication skills to avoid misunderstanding when they express their thoughts and opinions.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.005 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".