The effect of vocational rehabilitation on the use of health care services in Finland
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Background Because vocational rehabilitation is a separate service from other health services, there may be interruptions at their interface. We examined whether the use of health services changes before and after rehabilitation. Methods Longitudinal individual-level register-based data was utilized on all individuals aged 15-60 living in the city of Oulu, Finland and starting vocational rehabilitation in 2014-2015 (N = 792). We compared their use of outpatient health care services in 3-month periods from 1.5 years before to 1.5 after the rehabilitation period to the total population of the same age and to the propensity score matched controls. Several socio-demographic factors and sickness and employment histories were used for matching. Results According to the preliminary results, rehabilitees had on average 1.5 visits to outpatient health care services in the 6th quarter before the start of rehabilitation, twice that of the total population. In the 4th quarter before the start of rehabilitation, the number increased to 1.8. After the rehabilitation period, the quarterly number of visits were at the same level as in the beginning of the follow-up. The biggest changes took place in the use of occupational health services. Changes were modest in public health care services. In other services changes were minimal. Compared to the propensity score matched controls, vocational rehabilitation did not appear to have an effect on the use of health care services. Conclusions The use of health care services is more common before vocational rehabilitation than after it. The effect of rehabilitation on the use of health care needs further analysis. Key messages • The pattern of the use of health care services changes in the course of vocational rehabilitation. The changes are mainly due to visits in occupational health care services. • The use of health care services is most common before rehabilitation. However, vocational rehabilitation does not appear to have an effect on the use of outpatient and inpatient health care services.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.007 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".