MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4307383002 · doi:10.1093/eurpub/ckac129.615

Low-quality employment trajectories and mental health disorders among Swedish and migrant workers

2022· article· en· W4307383002 on OpenAlexaff
R Pollack, Bertina Kreshpaj, John Jonsson, Theo Bodin, Virginia Gunn, Cecilia Orellana, Per‐Olof Östergren, Carles Muntaner, Nuria Matilla‐Santander

Bibliographic record

VenueEuropean Journal of Public Health · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldHealth Professions
TopicEmployment and Welfare Studies
Canadian institutionsPublic Health OntarioUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDemographyMedicineHazard ratioConfidence intervalQuality (philosophy)Proportional hazards modelPopulationEnvironmental healthSurgerySociology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Aim This study aims to examine the effects of low-quality employment trajectories on severe common mental disorders (CMD) according to Swedish and foreign background. Methods This is a longitudinal study based on Swedish population registries (N = 2,703,687). Low- and high-quality employment trajectories observed across five years (2005-2009) are the exposure with severe CMD as outcome (2010-2017). Adjusted hazard ratios (HR) were calculated using Cox regression stratified according to background (first-generation (i) EU migrants, (ii) non-EU migrants, (iii) second-generation migrants, (iv) Swedish-born with Swedish background) and sex. The reference group were Swedish-born with Swedish background in a Constant high-quality employment trajectory. Results Second-generation migrants had an increased risk of CMD compared to Swedish-born with Swedish background when following low-quality employment trajectories (e.g., male in Constant low-quality HR: 1.53, 95% CI: 1.41-1.68). Female migrant workers, especially first-generation from non-Western countries in low-quality employment trajectories (e.g., Constant low-quality HR: 1.65, 95% CI:1.46 - 1.87), had a higher risk of CMD compared to female Swedish-born with Swedish background. The confidence interval for CMD risk showed little differences between migrant groups (1st and 2nd generation) compared to the reference group. Conclusions Low-quality employment trajectories appear to be determinants of risk for CMD, having a differential impact according to background of origin and sex. We observe a higher risk for severe CMD across migrant groups, especially second-generation migrants, compared to Swedish-born with Swedish background. Further qualitative research is recommended to understand the mechanism behind the differential mental health impact of low-quality employment trajectories according to foreign background. Key messages • First and second-generation migrants in low quality employment have higher risk of severe common mental disorders compared to Swedish born with Swedish background workers in low quality employment. • Policies targeting working conditions in low-quality employment and promoting workers mental well-being are essential to reduce this higher risk for developing CMD, especially for migrant populations.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.015
Threshold uncertainty score0.030

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.077
GPT teacher head0.387
Teacher spread0.310 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEuropean Journal of Public HealthSame topicEmployment and Welfare StudiesFrench-language works237,207