An update on national recommendations for the use of the adjuvanted recombinant zoster vaccine
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Background The adjuvanted recombinant zoster vaccine (RZV), first approved in 2017, has high, long-lasting efficacy against herpes zoster (HZ) and a clinically acceptable safety profile. In addition to the prevention of HZ in adults aged ≥50 years, the non-live RZV can be used from age 18 years in individuals with immunocompromised (IC) conditions. We reviewed the evolving landscape of national recommendations for RZV use. Methods National health authority and vaccination committee websites of countries where RZV is approved were searched in March 2022. Results Of 41 countries where RZV is licensed, 14 (Australia, Austria, Canada, Czech Republic, Germany, Ireland, Italy, Netherlands, New Zealand, Saudi Arabia, Spain, Switzerland, UK, US) provide national recommendations related to RZV; the majority are preferential to RZV or only recommend RZV. Overall, seven and seven countries recommend immunisation from age 50 years or 60/65 years, respectively. Of the seven countries that recommend immunisation from age 60/65 years, five recommend immunisation in individuals from age 50 years with comorbidities/IC conditions. Five countries recommend immunisation from age 18/19 years in individuals at increased risk of HZ due to immunosuppressive disease/treatment. In addition, six national recommendations refer to RZV safety and nine address prior HZ vaccination and/or infection. All recommendations outlined the RZV administration schedule. Conclusions Although national recommendations can inform decision making in clinical practice, RZV recommendations are not available in all licensed countries. The recommendations highlight a trend in favour of the use of RZV for the prevention of HZ in older individuals and those with IC conditions. Main messages: An increasing number of countries are providing recommendations for the use of RZV for the prevention of HZ in older individuals and those with IC conditions. Key messages • An increasing number of countries are providing recommendations for the use of RZV for the prevention of HZ in older individuals. • An increasing number of countries are providing recommendations for the use of RZV for the prevention of HZ in IC conditions.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.016 | 0.059 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.005 | 0.004 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.004 | 0.005 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.009 | 0.006 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".