Spatiotemporal patterns of putaminal dopamine processing in Parkinson’s disease: A multi-tracer positron emission tomography study
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Alterations in different aspects of dopamine processing may exhibit different progressive behaviours throughout the course of Parkinson’s disease. We used a novel data-driven multivariate approach to quantify and compare spatiotemporal patterns related to different aspects of dopamine processing from cross-sectional Parkinson’s subjects obtained with: 1) 69 [11C] ±dihydrotetrabenazine (DTBZ) scans, most closely related to dopaminergic denervation; 2) 73 [11C]d-threo-methylphenidate (MP) scans, marker of dopamine transporter density; 3) 50 6-[18F]fluoro-L-DOPA (FD) scans, marker of dopamine synthesis and storage. The anterior-posterior gradient in the putamen was identified as the most salient feature associated with disease progression, however the temporal progression of the spatial gradient was different for the three tracers. The expression of the anterior-posterior gradient was the highest for FD at disease onset compared to that of DTBZ and MP (P = 0.018 and P = 0.047 respectively), but decreased faster (P = 0.006) compared to that of DTBZ. The gradient expression for MP was initially similar but decreased faster (P = 0.015) compared to that for DTBZ. These results reflected unique temporal behaviours of regulatory mechanisms related to dopamine synthesis (FD) and reuptake (MP). While the relative early disease upregulation of dopamine synthesis in the anterior putamen prevalent likely extends to approximately 10 years after symptom onset, the presumed downregulation of dopamine transporter density may play a compensatory role in the prodromal/earliest disease stages only.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".