Presence of β<sub>2</sub>‐agonist growth promoters in human urine samples: GC‐MS/MS evaluation of the excretion profiles of ractopamine administered in microdoses
Bibliographic record
Abstract
-adrenergic agonists having the potential to be misused to enhance performance for their thermogenic and anabolic properties are prohibited in sports. Clenbuterol, ractopamine and zilpaterol are utilised legally or illegally as growth promoters of animals raised for their meat. No withdrawal times are imposed for ractopamine prior to slaughter; residues are detected in meat of treated animals, which constitutes a risk of inadvertent consumption. Insufficient information is available on the fate of ractopamine in humans to implement efficient detection in athletes' urine samples. We have developed a confirmation procedure for total ractopamine in urine following the enzymatic hydrolysis of glucuronides and sulphates and the conversion to tri-TMS derivative (limit of identification at 0.15 ng/ml). The sulphates were found to form between 85% to 97% of ractopamine excreted in athletes' urine samples analysed routinely or in volunteers following the administration of a micro-dose of 2.5 μg. Peak levels were reached at 2 to 6 h and decreased rapidly below 1 ng/ml 10 h after dosing. With one exception, the highest level estimated in athletes' samples was 1.2 ng/ml. Zilpaterol was confirmed in a few urine samples collected in the USA and Mexico (highest level 2 ng/ml), while hundreds of athletes' samples were reported to contain clenbuterol by our laboratory over the past 7 years. Most of these cases originated from Mexico (n = 102) and Guatemala (n = 119), often clustered in events during which multiple samples were collected, and for the vast majority, in levels lower than 0.2 ng/ml.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".