Tectonic evolution of the Proto-Qiangtang Ocean and its relationship with the Palaeo-Tethys and Rheic oceans
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract An evaluation of the potential geodynamic connections between the evolution of Paleozoic oceans in NW Gondwana and NE Gondwana is challenging. Until recently, most syntheses emphasized only two Paleozoic oceans (the Proto-Tethys and the Palaeo-Tethys) in the east Tethys realm. However, the discovery of early Paleozoic ophiolites along Palaeo-Tethys sutures located south of Proto-Tethys sutures challenges these traditional views. After a comprehensive review of relevant early Paleozoic tectonomagmatic events, we herein recognize and propose a model for the tectonic evolution of a hitherto unrecognized early Paleozoic ocean, which we call the Proto-Qiangtang Ocean. This ocean was short lived; it opened in the late Cambrian, began to subduct in the Middle Ordovician, and closed diachronously westwards between the Late Ordovician and the middle Silurian. Its closure by middle Silurian time indicates that was a spatially and temporally distinct ocean from the Palaeo-Tethys Ocean. The early tectonic evolution of the Proto-Qiangtang Ocean shares many characteristics with that of the Rheic Ocean. Both opened in the late Cambrian in the back-arc region of the Iapetus–Proto-Tethys Ocean, and the Proto-Qiangtang Ocean is considered to represent the eastern extension of the Rheic Ocean. This correlation has important implications for the Paleozoic tectonic evolution and palaeogeography of northern Gondwana.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".