MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4307522102 · doi:10.1101/2022.10.21.22281349

Association of viral variant and vaccination status with the occurrence of symptoms compatible with post-acute sequelae after primary SARS-CoV-2 infection

2022· preprint· en· W4307522102 on OpenAlexaff
Christian R. Kahlert, Carol Strahm, Sabine Güsewell, Alexia Cusini, Angela Brucher, Stephan Goppel, Jens Carsten Möller, Manuela Ortner, Markus Ruetti, Reto Stocker, Danielle Vuichard‐Gysin, Ulrike Besold, Allison McGeer, Lorenz Risch, Andrée Friedl, Matthias Schlegel, Pietro Vernazza, Stefan P. Kuster, Philipp Köhler

Bibliographic record

VenuemedRxiv · 2022
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicLong-Term Effects of COVID-19
Canadian institutionsSinai Health System
FundersUniversität ZürichBundesamt für Gesundheit
KeywordsMedicineVaccinationSerologyCohortProspective cohort studyInternal medicineSevere acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2)Cohort studyImmunologyPediatricsCoronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19)DiseaseAntibodyInfectious disease (medical specialty)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

ABSTRACT Importance Disentangling the effects of different SARS-CoV-2 variants and of vaccination on the occurrence of post-acute sequelae of SARS-CoV-2 (PASC) is crucial to estimate and potentially reduce the future burden of PASC. Objective To determine the association of primary SARS-CoV-2 infection on the frequency of PASC symptoms by viral variant and vaccination status. Design Cross-sectional questionnaire and SARS-CoV-2 serology (May/June 2022) performed within a prospective healthcare worker cohort (SURPRISE study). Setting Multicenter study in nine healthcare networks from North-Eastern Switzerland. Participants Volunteer sample of healthcare workers (HCW) from participating institutions. Of approximately 20’000 eligible participants, 3’870 registered for the cohort and 2’912 were included in this analysis. Exposures SARS-CoV-2 infection documented by positive nasopharyngeal swab (>4 weeks ago), stratified by viral variant and vaccination status at time of infection, compared to absence of documented infection (no positive swab, negative serology). Main Outcome Sum score of eighteen self-reported PASC symptoms. Results Among 2’912 participants (median age 44 years, 81.3% female), SARS-CoV-2 infection was reported by 1’685 (55.9%) participants, thereof 315 (18.7%) during Wild-type, 288 (17.1%) during Alpha/Delta, and 1’082 (64.2%) during Omicron circulation. Mean symptom number in previously infected participants significantly exceeded that of uninfected controls (0.39), but decreased with recency of the viral variant: 1.12 (p<0.001) for Wild-type (median time since infection 18.5 months), 0.67 (p<0.001) for Alpha/Delta (6.6 months), and 0.52 (p=0.005) for Omicron BA.1 (3.1 months) infected participants. After Omicron BA.1 infection, the mean symptom score was 0.49 (p=0.30) for those with ≥3 prior vaccinations and 0.71 (p=0.028) with 1-2 previous vaccinations compared to 0.36 for unvaccinated individuals. Adjusting for confounders, Wild-type (adjusted risk ratio [aRR] 2.81, 95% confidence interval [CI] 2.08-3.83) and Alpha/Delta infection (aRR 1.93, 95% CI 1.10-3.46) showed significant associations with the outcome, whereas Omicron BA.1 infection (aRR 1.29, 95% CI 0.69–2.43) and vaccination before infection (aRR 1.27, 95% CI 0.82–1.94) did not. Conclusions and Relevance Previous infection with pre-Omicron variants was the strongest risk factor for reporting PASC symptoms in this HCW cohort. A definite influence of prior vaccination on the prevention of PASC after Omicron BA.1 infection was not measurable.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.010

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.276
Teacher spread0.267 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuemedRxiv→Same topicLong-Term Effects of COVID-19→French-language works237,207→