MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4307549496 · doi:10.3390/rs14215351

Assessing Through-Water Structure-from-Motion Photogrammetry in Gravel-Bed Rivers under Controlled Conditions

2022· article· en· W4307549496 on OpenAlexaff
Chendi Zhang, Ao’ran Sun, Marwan A. Hassan, Chao Qin

Bibliographic record

VenueRemote Sensing · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicHydrology and Sediment Transport Processes
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
FundersState Key Laboratory of Hydraulics and Mountain River EngineeringSichuan UniversityTsinghua UniversityNational Natural Science Foundation of China
KeywordsFlumePhotogrammetryGeologyElevation (ballistics)Structure from motionBeach morphodynamicsDigital elevation modelSedimentHydrology (agriculture)Remote sensingFlow (mathematics)Geotechnical engineeringSediment transportGeomorphologyGeometryMotion (physics)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Structure-from-Motion (SfM) photogrammetry has become a popular solution for three-dimensional topographic data collection in geosciences and can be used for measuring submerged bed surfaces in shallow and clear water systems. However, the performance of through-water SfM photogrammetry has not been fully evaluated for gravel-bed surfaces, which limits its application to the morphodynamics of gravel-bed rivers in both field investigations and flume experiments. In order to evaluate the influence of bed texture, flow rate, ground control point (GCP) layout, and refraction correction (RC) on the measurement quality of through-water SfM photogrammetry, we conducted a series of experiments in a 70 m-long and 7 m-wide flume with a straight artificial channel. Bed surfaces with strongly contrasting textures in two 4 m-long reaches were measured under five constant flow regimes with three GCP layouts, including both dry and underwater GCPs. All the submerged surface models with/without RC were compared with the corresponding dry bed surfaces to quantify their elevation errors. The results illustrated that the poorly sorted gravel-bed led to the better performance of through-water SfM photogrammetry than the bed covered by fine sand. Fine sediment transport caused significant elevation errors, while the static sand dunes and grain clusters did not lead to noticeable errors in the corrected models with dry GCPs. The elevation errors of the submerged models linearly increased with water depth for all the tested conditions of bed textures, GCP layouts, and discharges in the uncorrected models, but the slopes of the increasing relations varied with texture. The use of underwater GCPs made significant improvements to the performance of direct through-water SfM photogrammetry, but counteracted with RC. The corrected models with dry GCPs outperformed the uncorrected ones with underwater GCPs, which could still be used to correct the underestimation in surface elevation caused by RC. Based on the new findings, recommendations for through-water SfM photogrammetry in measuring submerged gravel-bed surfaces were provided.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.580
Threshold uncertainty score0.998

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.253
Teacher spread0.239 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations16
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueRemote SensingSame topicHydrology and Sediment Transport ProcessesFrench-language works237,207