MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4307640442 · doi:10.1097/ogx.0000000000001061

Postpartum Hemorrhage: A Comprehensive Review of Guidelines

2022· review· en· W4307640442 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueObstetrical & Gynecological Survey · 2022
Typereview
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicMaternal and fetal healthcare
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineObstetricsIntensive care medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Importance: Postpartum hemorrhage (PPH) is a common complication of childbirth and the leading cause of maternal deaths worldwide, also associated with important secondary sequelae. Objective: The aim of this study was to review and compare the most recently published influential guidelines on evaluation, management, and prevention of this severe, life-threatening obstetric complication. Evidence Acquisition: A descriptive review of guidelines from the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists, the Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists, the Royal Australian and New Zealand College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists, the Society of Obstetricians and Gynecologists of Canada, the Network for the Advancement of Patient Blood Management, Hemostasis and Thrombosis in collaboration with the International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics, the European Board and College of Obstetrics and Gynecology and the European Society of Anaesthesiology, and the World Health Organization on PPH was carried out. Results: There is a consensus among the reviewed guidelines that once PPH occurs, it is important to identify the underlying cause (4 T's), estimate the blood loss, and immediately initiate a resuscitation protocol with fluid replacement, blood transfusion, and close monitoring of the woman. In case of uterine atony, all the reviewed medical societies recommend uterine massage, bimanual uterine compression, and administration of uterotonics, although minor discrepancies are observed regarding the optimal regimens. If these measures fail, the use of intrauterine balloon tamponade or other surgical interventions is unanimously recommended. There is also agreement regarding the management of PPH due to retained placenta, placenta accreta, obstetric trauma, uterine rupture or inversion, and acute coagulopathy. Massive transfusion protocols are not consistent in the reviewed guidelines. Finally, all guidelines highlight the importance of the active management of the third stage of labor for the prevention of PPH, suggesting several interventions, with the administration of oxytocin being the criterion standard. Conclusions: Postpartum hemorrhage is a significant contributor of maternal morbidity and mortality. Thus, the development of consistent international practice protocols for the effective management and prevention of this major complication seems of paramount importance and will hopefully improve obstetric outcomes and especially maternal mortality rate.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.025
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMetaresearch, Meta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.960
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.025
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0060.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0130.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.375
GPT teacher head0.463
Teacher spread0.088 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it