Soil salinity mapping using remote sensing and GIS
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The monitoring of soil salinity plays a vital role in agricultural society. Soil salinity causes land degradation processes, especially in arid and semi-arid regions, which influence soil properties, reduce yield production of crops, and affect infrastructure. This research produces soil salinity mapping of the East Delta in Egypt in 1995 using remote sensing technology. A Landsat 5 image taken on 26 September 1995 was used. Radiometric and atmospheric corrections for satellite data were applied. Different salinity indices (SIs) were used, such as the normalized difference salinity index, SI1, SI2, SI3, SI4, SI5, SI6, and SI7, in addition to the normalized difference vegetation index, which was used for data filtration. The field’s electrical conductivity was measured during the period from 22 to 26 September 1995 by the Japanese International Cooperation Agency. These data were used as ground truth for the correlation analysis with different indices image bands values. Simple linear regression and mean relative error were used to find the best index, which was SI5 with a 0.87 correlation with field truth data and mean relative error equal 22.7%. This index was used to produce a salinity map of the Eastern Delta with acceptable accuracy. Finally, it is concluded that using remote sensing in salinity detection and mapping is highly appreciated.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it