MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4307840769 · doi:10.1126/scitranslmed.ade7646

In vitro and in vivo efficacy of tecovirimat against a recently emerged 2022 monkeypox virus isolate

2022· article· en· W4307840769 on OpenAlexaffabout
Bryce M. Warner, Levi Klassen, Angela Sloan, Yvon Deschambault, Geoff Soule, Logan Banadyga, Jingxin Cao, James E. Strong, Darwyn Kobasa, David Safronetz

Bibliographic record

VenueScience Translational Medicine · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldImmunology and Microbiology
TopicPoxvirus research and outbreaks
Canadian institutionsCanadian Mennonite UniversityUniversity of ManitobaPublic Health Agency of Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMonkeypoxOutbreakIn vivoVirologyVirusIn vitroBiologyMedicineVacciniaGene

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The recent emergence of the monkeypox virus (MPXV) in non-endemic countries has been designated a Public Health Emergency of International Concern by the World Health Organization. There are currently no approved treatments for MPXV infection in the United States or Canada. The antiviral drug tecovirimat (commonly called TPOXX), previously approved for smallpox treatment, is currently being deployed for treatment of MPXV infections where available based on previously accrued data. We tested the efficacy of TPOXX both in vitro and in vivo against a clade 2 Canadian 2022 isolate of MPXV isolated during the current outbreak. TPOXX prevented MPXV replication in vitro with an effective concentration in the nanomolar range. To evaluate TPOXX efficacy in vivo, we first characterized the CAST/EiJ mouse model with the same 2022 Canadian isolate. Unlike previous descriptions of this model, the Canadian isolate was not lethal in CAST/EiJ mice, although it replicated efficiently in the respiratory tract after intranasal infection. Subsequent experiments demonstrated that daily oral TPOXX treatment markedly reduced viral titers in the tissues 1 and 2 weeks after infection. Our data indicate that TPOXX is highly effective against currently circulating MPXV strains and could be an important contributor to curbing the ongoing outbreak.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.253
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.296
Teacher spread0.278 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations80
Published2022
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueScience Translational MedicineSame topicPoxvirus research and outbreaksFrench-language works237,207