MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4307844964 · doi:10.1111/coa.13996

Wound healing in endoscopic sinus surgery: Phase 1 clinical trial evaluating the role of Chitogel with adjuvants

2022· article· en· W4307844964 on OpenAlexaff
Rajan Sundaresan Vediappan, Catherine Bennett, Clare Cooksley, Ahmed Bassiouni, John R. Scott, Yazeed Al Suliman, Jate Lumyongsatien, Stephen C. Moratti, Alkis J. Psaltis, Sarah Vreugde, Peter‐John Wormald

Bibliographic record

VenueClinical Otolaryngology · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicSinusitis and nasal conditions
Canadian institutionsDalhousie University
FundersUniversity of AdelaideHospital Research Foundation
KeywordsMedicineFunctional endoscopic sinus surgerySurgeryStatistical significanceRandomized controlled trialEndoscopic sinus surgeryChronic rhinosinusitisWound healingSinus (botany)OstiumClinical trialStenosisSinusitisInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to determine the safety and efficacy of Chitogel, with and without Deferiprone (Def) and Gallium Protoporphyrin (GaPP), as a promoter of wound healing to improve surgical outcomes after endoscopic sinus susgery. DESIGN: A double-blinded, randomised control human clinical trial was conducted in patients undergoing ESS as a treatment for chronic rhinosinusitis. Participants underwent functional ESS or FESS with drill out as required and were randomised to receive test product Chitogel, Chitogel in combination with Def or Def-GaPP versus no packing (control). SETTING: Ostial stenosis and persistent inflammation are the main reasons for revision endoscopic sinus surgery (ESS). Post-operative (PO) dressings can improve PO wound healing and patient outcomes after ESS. PARTICIPANTS: Eighty two patients were included in this study with 79 patients completing the study with 40 undergoing full house FESS and 39 FESS plus frontal drillout. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Patients were followed up at 2, 6 and 12 weeks PO, and outcome scores such as SNOT-22, VAS and LKS, pre and post-surgery (12 weeks) were compared. RESULTS: Seventy nine patients completed the study, there was a significant reduction in SNOT-22 score and improvement of VAS at 12 weeks in patients treated with Chitogel compared to control (p < .05). In those patients, the mean ostium area for the Chitogel and the Chitogel + Def + GaPP groups was higher across all three sinuses compared to the no-treatment control group, without statistical significance. Sphenoid sinus ostium was significantly more patent in patients treated with Chitogel compared to the control at the 12-week time point (p < .05). CONCLUSION: Chitogel as a PO dressing after ESS results in the best patient-reported symptom scores and objective measurements. The combination of Def and GaPP to Chitogel though proving safe, had no effect on the ostium patency or mucosal healing.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Non-randomized trial · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.012

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.147
GPT teacher head0.466
Teacher spread0.319 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNon-randomized trial
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations7
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueClinical OtolaryngologySame topicSinusitis and nasal conditionsFrench-language works237,207