MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4307866164 · doi:10.56606/albama.v15i2.89

DAMPAK COVID-19 TERHADAP PEREKONOMIAN INDONESIA DARI SISI PENDAPATAN NASIONAL PENDEKATAN PRODUKSI

2022· article· en· W4307866164 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Ilham Tri Murdo, Junaidi Affan, Faza Hudaya

Bibliographic record

VenueALBAMA JURNAL BISNIS ADMINISTRASI DAN MANAJEMEN · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicCOVID-19 Prevention and Impact
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsQuarter (Canadian coin)Goods and servicesBusinessCoronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19)IndonesianAgricultural economicsAccommodationProcurementConsumption (sociology)PluckingEconomyGeographyEconomicsMarketing

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The number of Covid-19 cases worldwide continues to show a rapid increase. As of October 31, 2020, the number of cases has reached 45,866,380 and 1,192,684 deaths worldwide, 410,088 people exposed and 13,869 people died in Indonesia. The study aims to determine the extent of the impact of Covid-19 on the Indonesian economy in terms of national income, which is calculated based on the mode of production (business field) Y =  (Pi.Qi)), and predictions in the future, if possible. The Covid-19 pandemic is still going on for a long time. Large-Scale Social Restrictions (PSBB) which were implemented in various regions in Indonesia in April and May, suppressed economic activity in all sectors. Some business sectors have been forced to lay off their employees. Meanwhile, people hold their consumption until conditions are more stable. As a result, Indonesia's economic growth in the second quarter of 2020 contracted by 5.3 percent (YoY). 
 Contribution of corrections came from mining and quarrying (-2.72%), processing industry (6.19%), electricity and gas procurement (-5.46), construction (-5.39%), Wholesale and Retail Trade; Repair of Cars and Motorcycles (-7.57%), Transportation and Warehousing (-30.84%), Provision of Accommodation and Food and Drink (-22.02), company services (-12.09%), and other services ( -12.60%). Then other sectors grew positively in the range of 1.03% -10.88%, with the largest positive growth contribution in the information and communication sector by 10.88%. 

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.793
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0050.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.061
GPT teacher head0.377
Teacher spread0.317 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueALBAMA JURNAL BISNIS ADMINISTRASI DAN MANAJEMENSame topicCOVID-19 Prevention and ImpactFrench-language works237,207