A cuproptosis-related long non-coding RNA signature to predict the prognosis and immune microenvironment characterization for lung adenocarcinoma
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Background: Cuproptosis or copper-dependent cell death is a newly identified non-apoptotic cell death pathway which plays a critical role in the development of multiple cancers. Long non-coding RNAs (lncRNAs) are increasingly recognized as crucial regulators of programmed cell death and lung adenocarcinoma (LUAD) development, and a comprehensive understanding of cuproptosis-related lncRNAs may improve prognosis prediction of LUAD. However, few studies have explored the association of cuproptosis-related lncRNAs with the prognosis of LUAD. Methods: The RNA sequencing data and corresponding clinical information of patients were extracted from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) database. Five hundred LUAD patients were randomly divided into a training (n=250) and a testing cohort (n=250). Pearson correlations were performed to identify cuproptosis-related lncRNAs, and univariate Cox regression was performed to screen prognostic lncRNAs. A cuproptosis-related lncRNAs prognostic signature (CLPS) was constructed by the least absolute shrinkage and selection operator Cox regression. Kaplan-Meier analysis, receiver operating characteristic curves, and multivariate Cox regression were performed to verify the prognostic performance of CLPS. Additionally, immune cell infiltration was estimated using the single-sample gene-set enrichment analysis. pRRophetic algorithm and Tumor Immune Dysfunction and Exclusion algorithm were used to assess the immunotherapy and chemotherapy response, respectively. Results: CLPS was established based on 61 cuproptosis-related prognostic lncRNAs and exhibited a satisfactory performance predicting LUAD patients' survival (area under the curve at 1, 3, 5 years was 0.784, 0.749, 0.775, respectively). multivariate Cox analysis confirmed the independent prognostic effect of CLPS (hazard ratio: 1.128; 95% confidence interval: 1.071-1.189; P<0.001), and a nomogram containing it exhibited robust validity in prognostic prediction. We further demonstrated a higher CLPS-risk score was associated with lower levels of signatures including immune cell infiltration, immune activation, and immune checkpoints. Conclusions: The CLPS serves as an effective predictor for the prognosis and therapeutic responses of LUAD patients. Our findings provide promising novel biomarkers and therapeutic targets for LUAD.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".