University Students’ Awareness of the ‘Business Incubators’ Concept and Their Role in Advancing Socio-Economic Development
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This study aims to identify the university students in the United Arab Emirates who are aware of the concept of ‘business incubators’, and their role in enhancing socio-economic development. Moreover, the research sample is 150 students from Al Ain University during the first semester of 2020/2021. Additionally, study goals are achieved by using a descriptive analysis that employs personality interview. Hence, the research’s results reveal that there is a medium level of awareness about the concept of business incubators as economic development projects. Most students believe that business incubators are one of the best social policies, which are adopted by first world countries. In fact, most of the students’ responses in the Human and Social colleges focus in reducing the phenomenon of unemployment, which helps to mitigate poverty, crime. In addition, it helps to minimize unemployment, which is associated with depression that may lead young people to undergo deviation. Eventually, young people who are considered essential elements in society, are able to adopt the concept of business incubators, and their ideas can contribute in the development of qualitative and innovative projects that promote the state and protect it from global crises as well as security and social stability. This study provides recommendations and suggestions for further research.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.004 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".