Host Range and Phenology of Sugarcane Aphid (Hemiptera: Aphididae) and Natural Enemy Community in Sorghum in Haiti
Bibliographic record
Abstract
To determine the factors leading to outbreaks of the sugarcane aphid, Melanaphis sacchari, (Zehntner) (Hemiptera: Aphididae) in sorghum in Haiti, a survey was carried out on farms during two cropping seasons, spring and fall of 2018. A total of 45 plots in three Haitian regions were monitored from the five-leaf stage to grain ripening. Infestation with M. sacchari was significantly higher in spring than in fall, except in one location. Melanaphis sacchari populations varied significantly according to phenological stages of sorghum, with significantly higher abundance during the heading and flowering stages than other stages. In and around sorghum fields, the sugarcane aphid was observed on plants from three families: Poaceae, Malvaceae, and Cucurbitaceae. Aphid natural enemies found in sorghum fields consisted of eight species of ladybeetles (Coleoptera: Coccinellidae), one hoverfly (Diptera: Syrphidae), one lacewing (Neuroptera: Chrysopidae), and one predatory midge (Diptera: Cecidomyiidae). In addition to these predators, two parasitoid species, Adialytus sp. (Hymenoptera: Braconidae) and Pachyneuron aphidis (Bouché) (Hymenoptera: Pteromalidae), emerged from sugarcane aphid mummies. Predator and parasitoid densities were highly affected by growing season, with most of the biological control happening in fall. This study provides insights on sugarcane aphid management in Haiti and the Caribbean Islands.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".