MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4307969601 · doi:10.1503/cmaj.212124

Assessing the need for Black mentorship within residency training in Canada

2022· article· en· W4307969601 on OpenAlexafffundvenueabout
Onaope Egbedeyi, Hadal El-Hadi, Tina R. Madzima, Teresa Semalulu, Modupe Tunde‐Byass, Rukia Swaleh

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Medical Association Journal · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicDiversity and Career in Medicine
Canadian institutionsMcMaster UniversityUniversity of British ColumbiaThe Scarborough HospitalPublic Health OntarioUniversity of TorontoUniversity of Alberta
FundersRoyal College of Physicians and Surgeons of Canada
KeywordsMentorshipPrejudice (legal term)Medical educationEquity (law)Promotion (chess)Residency trainingDiversity (politics)Underrepresented MinorityMedicinePsychologySocial psychologyPolitical science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

KEY POINTS Black medical learners often experience racial prejudice, microaggressions, isolation and biased assessments during their medical training. Furthermore, rates of recruitment, retention and promotion are lower among Black learners and faculty. Formal equity, diversity and inclusive

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.013
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMetaresearch, Science and technology studies
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: Incentives · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.996
Threshold uncertainty score0.387

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.013
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0090.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0020.003
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0070.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.040
GPT teacher head0.293
Teacher spread0.253 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

Study designQualitative
DomainIncentives
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations17
Published2022
Admission routes4
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Medical Association JournalSame topicDiversity and Career in MedicineFrench-language works237,207