Exploring functional interplay amongst Escherichia coli efflux pumps
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Bacterial efflux pumps exhibit functional interplay that can translate to additive or multiplicative effects on resistance to antimicrobial compounds. In diderm bacteria, two different efflux pump structural types – single-component inner membrane efflux pumps and cell envelope-spanning multicomponent systems – cooperatively export antimicrobials with cytoplasmic targets from the cell. Harnessing our recently developed efflux platform, which is built upon an extensively efflux-deficient strain of Escherichia coli , here we explore interplay amongst a panel of diverse E. coli efflux pumps. Specifically, we assessed the effect of simultaneously expressing two efflux pump-encoding genes on drug resistance, including single-component inner membrane efflux pumps (MdfA, MdtK and EmrE), tripartite complexes (AcrAB, AcrAD, MdtEF and AcrEF), and the acquired TetA(C) tetracycline resistance pump. Overall, the expression of two efflux pump-encoding genes from the same structural type did not enhance resistance levels regardless of the antimicrobial compound or efflux pump under investigation. In contrast, a combination of the tripartite efflux systems with single-component pumps sharing common substrates provided multiplicative increases to antimicrobial resistance levels. In some instances, resistance was increased beyond the product of resistance provided by the two pumps individually. In summary, the developed efflux platform enables the isolation of efflux pump function, facilitating the identification of interactions between efflux pumps.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".