Cardiac <scp>MRI</scp> Left Atrial Strain Associated With <scp>New‐Onset</scp> Atrial Fibrillation in Patients With <scp>ST</scp>‐Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Left atrial (LA) strain is associated with structural remodeling of the LA. Whether there is an association between LA strain obtained by cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and new-onset atrial fibrillation (AF) after ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) is unclear. PURPOSE: To investigate the relationship between LA strain and new-onset AF after STEMI. STUDY TYPE: Retrospective. POPULATION: Three hundred and seventy-nine STEMI patients were enrolled, of which 26 had new-onset AF. FIELD STRENGTH/SEQUENCE: 3.0 T, balanced turbo field echo sequence. ASSESSMENT: Patients were divided into w/o AF group and new-onset AF group. Cardiac MRI images were analyzed using cardiovascular imaging software CVI 42 (Circle Cardiovascular Imaging, Canada). An automatic tracing algorithm was applied to obtain strain values. The reservoir strain, conduit strain, and booster strain were included in model 1, model 2, and model 3, respectively. STATISTICAL TESTS: Student's t-test, Mann-Whiney U test, and chi-square test were performed. Variables with a P ≤ 0.05 were incorporated into the logistic regression analysis. Area under curve of receiver operating characteristic was used to assess the ability of LA strain to identify new-onset AF. Bayesian information criterion, Akaike information criterion, and C-index were used to make comparisons between three models. P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. RESULTS: Three models were used to assess LA strain identification ability for new-onset AF. After including multiple factors, right coronary artery (RCA), LVEF, and reservoir strain were still risk factors for new-onset AF in model 1. In model 2, age, RCA, LVEF, and conduit strain were still risk factors for new-onset AF. In model 3, RCA, LVEF, LVEDVi, and booster strain were still risk factors for new-onset AF. Model 2 has a stronger identification ability than others. DATA CONCLUSION: LA strain associated with new-onset AF after STEMI. The model including conduit strain was the best-fit one. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 4 TECHNICAL EFFICACY: Stage 3.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".