ANFIS Based Energy Management System for V2G Integrated Micro-Grids
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Description and evaluation of an adaptive neuro-fuzzy inference system (ANFIS) based energy management system (EMS) for a vehicle-to-grid integrated micro-grid is given in this paper. A grid-tied micro-grid with a wind turbine and a photovoltaic solar panel as primary energy sources, and an energy storage system based on electric vehicle (EV) batteries is considered in this study. The ANFIS-based supervisory controller determines the power that must be generated by or stored in the EV batteries, taking into account the power demanded by the micro-grid and available EV power considering the battery state of charge, rated capacity, and time remaining for departure of the EVs. The Sugeno based ANFIS EMS is compared with a Mamdani based fuzzy EMS, thus evaluating two different artificial intelligence approaches for solving the same power allocation problem. Dynamic simulations demonstrate that the ANFIS based EMS is able to allocate power optimally among available resources during various uncertainties simulated in the system and is also able to provide a better power allocation when compared to the fuzzy based EMS.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".