MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Ultrasound Operator Variance Classification for Agency in Artificial Intelligence Support of Cyber-Physical Systems

2022· article· en· W4308090756 on OpenAlexafffund
Calvin Zhu, Thomas E. Doyle, Michael D. Noseworthy

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicRadiomics and Machine Learning in Medical Imaging
Canadian institutionsVector InstituteMcMaster University
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsComputer scienceArtificial intelligenceDeep learningMachine learningLeverage (statistics)Operator (biology)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Ultrasound (US) is the most widely used medical imaging modality due to its low cost, portability, real time imaging ability and use of non-ionizing radiation. However, unlike other imaging modalities such as CT or MRI, it is a heavily operator dependent, requiring trained expertise to leverage these benefits. More broadly, the natural interaction between human and computer in general cyber-physical systems would benefit from the support of artificial intelligence (AI) that has the agency to adapt its response based on operator variance. The focus of this paper will be on US operator variance as a first step in demonstrating the concept of AI agency. Recently there has been an explosion of interest in AI across the medical community and many are turning to the growing trend of deep learning (DL) models to assist in diagnosis. However, deep learning models do not perform as well when training data is not fully representative of the problem. Due to this difference in training and deployment, model performance suffers which can lead to misdiagnosis. This issue is known as dataset shift. Two aims to address dataset shift were proposed. The first was to quantify how US operator skill and hardware affects acquired images. The second was to use this skill quantification method to screen and match data to deep learning models to improve performance. A CAE Healthcare BLUE phantom with various mock lesions was scanned by three operators using three different US systems (Siemens S3000, Clarius L15, and Ultrasonix SonixTouch) producing 39013 images. DL models were trained on a specific set to classify the presence of a simulated tumour and tested with data from differing sets. PCA for dimension reduction was applied then K-Means clustering was used to separate images into clusters. This clustering algorithm was then used to screen incoming images during deployment to best match input to an appropriate DL model which is trained specifically to classify that type of operator or hardware. Results showed a noticeable difference when models were given data from differing datasets with the largest accuracy drop being 81.26% to 31.26%.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.932
Threshold uncertainty score0.308

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.037
GPT teacher head0.336
Teacher spread0.299 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2022
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicRadiomics and Machine Learning in Medical ImagingFrench-language works237,207