Self-labelled encoder-decoder (SLED) for multi-echo gradient echo-based myelin water imaging
Bibliographic record
Abstract
PURPOSE: Reconstruction of high quality myelin water imaging (MWI) maps is challenging, particularly for data acquired using multi-echo gradient echo (mGRE) sequences. A non-linear least squares fitting (NLLS) approach has often been applied for MWI. However, this approach may produce maps with limited detail and, in some cases, sub-optimal signal to noise ratio (SNR), due to the nature of the voxel-wise fitting. In this study, we developed a novel, unsupervised learning method called self-labelled encoder-decoder (SLED) to improve gradient echo-based MWI data fitting. METHODS: Ultra-high resolution, MWI data was collected from five mouse brains with variable levels of myelination, using a mGRE sequence. Imaging data was acquired using a 7T preclinical MRI system. A self-labelled, encoder-decoder network was implemented in TensorFlow for calculation of myelin water fraction (MWF) based on the mGRE signal decay. A simulated MWI phantom was also created to evaluate the performance of MWF estimation. RESULTS: Compared to NLLS, SLED demonstrated improved MWF estimation, in terms of both stability and accuracy in phantom tests. In addition, SLED produced less noisy MWF maps from high resolution MR microscopy images of mouse brain tissue. It specifically resulted in lower noise amplification for all mouse genotypes that were imaged and yielded mean MWF values in white matter ROIs that were highly correlated with those derived from standard NLLS fitting. Lastly, SLED also exhibited higher tolerance to low SNR data. CONCLUSION: Due to its unsupervised and self-labeling nature, SLED offers a unique alternative to analyze gradient echo-based MWI data, providing accurate and stable MWF estimations.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".