MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4308200450 · doi:10.1101/2022.11.02.514865

Apoptotic contraction drives target cell release by cytotoxic T cells

2022· preprint· en· W4308200450 on OpenAlexafffund
Elisa E. Sanchez, María Tello‐Lafoz, Aixuan J. Guo, Miguel de Jesus, Benjamin Y. Winer, Sadna Budhu, Eric Chun Yong Chan, Eric Rosiek, Taisuke Kondo, Justyn DuSold, Naomi Taylor, Grégoire Altan‐Bonnet, Michael F. Olson, Morgan Huse

Bibliographic record

VenuebioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · 2022
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCAR-T cell therapy research
Canadian institutionsToronto Metropolitan University
FundersCanadian Institutes of Health ResearchCanada Research ChairsLudwig Institute for Cancer ResearchNational Institutes of HealthMemorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer CenterCancer Research Institute
KeywordsCytotoxic T cellCTL*Cell biologyContraction (grammar)Immunological synapseContractilityApoptosisCytoskeletonStimulationCellBiologyImmune systemChemistryT cellNeuroscienceImmunologyT-cell receptorBiochemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

ABSTRACT Cytotoxic T lymphocytes (CTLs) use immune synapses to destroy infected or transformed target cells. Although the mechanisms governing synapse assembly have been studied extensively, little is known about how this interface dissociates, which is a critical step that both frees the CTL to search for additional prey and enables the phagocytosis of target corpses. Here, we applied time-lapse imaging to explore the basis for synapse dissolution and found that it occurred concomitantly with the cytoskeletal contraction of apoptotic targets. Genetic and pharmacological disruption of apoptotic contraction indicated that it was necessary for CTL dissociation. Furthermore, acute stimulation of contractile forces triggered the release of live targets, demonstrating that contraction is sufficient to drive the response. Finally, mechanically amplifying apoptotic contractility promoted faster CTL detachment and serial killing. Collectively, these results establish a biophysical basis for synapse dissolution and highlight the importance of mechanosensory feedback in the regulation of cell-cell interactions.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.248
Teacher spread0.235 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2022
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuebioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)Same topicCAR-T cell therapy researchFrench-language works237,207