MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4308274217 · doi:10.1101/2022.11.02.514970

Single-cell assessment of trophoblast stem cell-based organoids as human placenta-modeling platforms

2022· preprint· en· W4308274217 on OpenAlexafffund
Matthew J. Shannon, Gina L. McNeill, Burak Koksal, Jennet Baltayeva, Jasmin Wächter, Bárbara Castellana, Maria S. Peñaherrera, Wendy P. Robinson, Peter C. K. Leung, Alexander G. Beristain

Bibliographic record

VenuebioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · 2022
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicPregnancy and preeclampsia studies
Canadian institutionsBC Children's HospitalUniversity of British Columbia
FundersCanadian Institutes of Health ResearchNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaUniversity of British ColumbiaBC Children's Hospital
KeywordsTrophoblastOrganoidProgenitor cellCell biologyStem cellBiologyCellular differentiationTranscriptomeCell fate determinationCell typeCellPlacentaComputational biologyTranscription factorGeneticsFetusGeneGene expression

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

SUMMARY The recent discovery of human trophoblast stem cells (hTSC) and techniques allowing for trophoblast organoid (TOrg) culture have established promising approaches for studying human trophoblast development. To validate the accuracy of these models at single-cell resolution, we directly compared in vitro TOrg cultures derived from primary progenitor cytotrophoblasts (CTB) or commercially available hTSC lines to in vivo human trophoblasts using a scRNA-seq approach. While patient-derived (PD)- and hTSC-derived TOrgs overall reflect cell differentiation trajectories with accuracy, specific features related to trophoblast state make-up, distinct sub-paths of differentiation, and predicted transcriptional drivers regulating stem cell maintenance were shown to be misaligned in the in vitro platforms. This is best exemplified by the identification of a distinct progenitor state in hTSC-derived TOrgs that showed characteristics of CTB- and extravillous-like cell states. Together, this work provides a comprehensive resource that identifies underlying strengths and limitations of current TOrg platforms. Summary Statement Single-cell transcriptomics provides comprehensive comparison between trophoblast organoids derived from commercially available trophoblast stem cells and first-trimester primary human cytotrophoblasts. HIGHLIGHTS An integrated single cell transcriptomic atlas of placental and organoid trophoblasts establishes a comprehensive and public web-based resource Direct comparison of trophoblasts from placental/decidual tissue to trophoblasts extracted from two distinct organoid platforms highlights both conserved and divergent features Computational modeling describes novel trophoblast states and routes of cell differentiation in human trophoblast organoids IN BRIEF While the merits and utility of current trophoblast organoid cultures have been established, high-resolution assessment and comparison of conserved and divergent features of these systems to cell states and differentiation trajectories of trophoblasts in situ or in vitro has not been performed. Here, Shannon et al. generate a single-cell transcriptomic atlas of two trophoblast organoids that comprehensively define the similarities and discrepancies in relation to trophoblasts from the placental-maternal interface.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.027
GPT teacher head0.256
Teacher spread0.229 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2022
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuebioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)→Same topicPregnancy and preeclampsia studies→French-language works237,207→