MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4308314670 · doi:10.54691/bcpbm.v31i.2531

Analysis of The Transformation in Pinduoduo Based on SWOT Model and 4C Marketing Theory

2022· article· en· W4308314670 on OpenAlexaff
Xinyi Cai, Mengbo Wang, Yu Jiahui

Bibliographic record

VenueBCP Business & Management · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBusiness, Management and Accounting
TopicE-commerce and Technology Innovations
Canadian institutionsQueen's University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSWOT analysisMarketingBusinessContext (archaeology)Marketing strategyCompetition (biology)Competitive advantageGreen marketingIndustrial organization

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

With the rapid development of the Internet in China, the competition in the field of e-commerce is becoming more and more fierce. Under the impact of economic expansion and COVID-19, it is no longer feasible for e-commerce platforms maintain their original competitive strategies. In this context, how to fully grasp the advantages of existing competitive strategies and take advantage of the opportunities brought by the external environment has become an important task for the sustainable development of e-commerce platforms. Under this background, Pinduoduo actively responds to the impact of the epidemic and changes in the economic environment, makes full use of its advantages in the low-end market and unique social marketing strategies, and gradually puts its marketing focus on the investment in agricultural scientific research to adapt to the changes in the e-commerce market and consumer behaviour at the present stage. Guided by the 4C marketing theory, this paper studies consumer habits from the four directions of consumer, cost, convenience and communication. Then the SWOT analysis was applied to study the internal and external environment of Pinduoduo agriculture and community group buying business transformation. The analysis results showed that Pinduoduo has some deficiencies in its transformation. Next, in view of the shortcomings in the transformation, combined with the existing literature and relevant materials, this study put forward optimization suggestions from the four directions of consumer, cost, convenience and communication.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.011
Threshold uncertainty score0.040

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0040.005
Science and technology studies0.0020.002
Scholarly communication0.0040.003
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.212
Teacher spread0.199 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBCP Business & ManagementSame topicE-commerce and Technology InnovationsFrench-language works237,207