Soil Macrofauna Diversity and Litter Decomposition Rate in the Buffer Zone of Lore Lindu Biosphere Reserve Indonesia
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Conversion of forest to agricultural land (agroforestry and monoculture) has a negative impact on soil macrofauna diversity. Soil macrofauna have a key role in maintaining soil fertility through decomposition and supporting the productive capacity of ecosystems. This study aimed at determining the soil macrofauna diversity and the litter decomposition rate in agroforestry and monoculture and investigating the correlation between soil macrofauna diversity and litter decomposition rate. This study involved field and laboratory activities. Litter traps were installed for soil macrofauna observation, macrofauna identification was carried out in the laboratory, and litter bags were used for decomposition rate observation. Data analysis was conducted to determine species diversity and similarity of soil macrofauna on agroforestry and monoculture plantations. The calculation of the diversity index (H’) shows that complex agroforestry and simple agroforestry have moderate, while candlenut monoculture has low diversity of soil macrofauna. The similarity of soil macrofauna in these sites is low (similarity index below 50%). The decomposition rate of litter is relatively high (0.01 g/day). The correlation between species diversity and the decomposition rate of litter in complex agroforestry and candlenut monoculture is very strong. Meanwhile, in simple agroforestry, the correlation is relatively low.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it